Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi Ingo,

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Certainly we can postpone it, as long as there's rough strategic
> consensus on the way forward. I'd hate to have two overlapping core
> kernel facilities and friction between the groups pursuing them and
> constant distraction from having two targets.

Sure, like I said, I think "kmem perf" is the way forward. The only
reason we did kmemtrace userspace out-of-tree was because there was no
perf (or ftrace!) at the time and there wasn't much interest in
putting userspace tools in the tree.

I hope that counts as a "rough strategic consensus" :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/