Re: [PATCH] x86: fix gart iommu using for amd 64 bit system

[Ingo Molnar]

* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > don't think user will like to use SWIOTLB instead of swiotlb.
> 
> I doubt that users care about a way to fix their problems.

As far as swiotlb vs. GART goes, arguably a non-bouncing hw based 
solution (GART) is superior to a bouncing one (swiotlb), right?

	ngo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/