Re: lockdep complaints in slab allocator

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 13:03 -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > Merge SLQB and rm mm/sl[ua]b.c include/linux/sl[ua]b.h for .33-rc1
> > 
> 
> slqb still has a 5-10% performance regression compared to slab for 
> benchmarks such as netperf TCP_RR on machines with high cpu counts, 
> forcing that type of regression isn't acceptable.

Having _4_ slab allocators is equally unacceptable.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/