Re: [PATCH 1/2] hrtimer: correct a few numbers in comments and printkoutputs

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Wed Nov 25 2009 - 15:19:02 EST


On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:14:03 +0100
> Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hello Andrew,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 03:25:16PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:23:39 +0100
> > > Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ int tick_dev_program_event(struct clock_event_device *dev, ktime_t expires,
> > > > printk(KERN_WARNING
> > > > "CE: %s increasing min_delta_ns to %lu nsec\n",
> > > > dev->name ? dev->name : "?",
> > > > - dev->min_delta_ns << 1);
> > > > + dev->min_delta_ns);
> > > >
> > > > i = 0;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > This one's already in linux-next:
> > >
> > > @@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ int tick_dev_program_event(struct clock_
> > > dev->min_delta_ns += dev->min_delta_ns >> 1;
> > >
> > > printk(KERN_WARNING
> > > - "CE: %s increasing min_delta_ns to %lu nsec\n",
> > > + "CE: %s increasing min_delta_ns to %llu nsec\n",
> > > dev->name ? dev->name : "?",
> > > - dev->min_delta_ns << 1);
> > > + (unsigned long long) dev->min_delta_ns << 1);
> > '<< 1' is wrong here, too.
> >
>
> What's wrong with it? That leftshift appears to be to compensate for
> the rightshift a few lines above.
>
> That change was unobvious and unchangelogged, so here we are again.

That's actually my fault. In commit 61c22c34 I removed the WARN_ON
which we put there to gather data on kerneloops.org for a while and
did not fix the printk format string.

Will take care of it. Thanks,

tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/