Re: [RFC,PATCH 14/14] utrace core

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:32:27PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This adds the utrace facility, a new modular interface in the kernel
> > for implementing user thread tracing and debugging.  This fits on top
> > of the tracehook_* layer, so the new code is well-isolated.
> 
> Could we just drop the tracehook layer if this finally merged
> and call the low level functions directly?
> 
> It might have been reasonably early on when it was still out of tree,
> but longer term when it's integrated having strange opaque hooks
> like that just makes the coder harder to read and maintain.

I agree that linux/tracehook.h as a separate layer is pretty annoying,
but a lot of the helper actually are quite useful.  I'd suggest to throw
a patch ontop of the series to rename all the useful macros to utrace_
and move them into utrace.h and just remove those that are really
trivial wrappers.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/