Re: [PATCH 1/4] veth: move loopback logic to common location

[Eric W. Biederman]

Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 November 2009, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>>> I don't quite follow what you intend with dev_queue_xmit when the macvlan
>>>> is in one namespace and the real physical device is in another.  Are
>>>> you mentioning that the packet classifier runs in the namespace where
>>>> the primary device lives with packets from a different namespace?
>>> Exactly. And I think we should make sure that the namespace of
>>> the macvlan device can't (deliberately or accidentally) cause
>>> misclassification.
>> 
>> This is independent of my series and a preexisting problem, right?
>
> Correct.
>
>> Which fields do you think need to be reset to maintain namespace
>> isolation for the outbound path in macvlan?
>
> In addition to those already handled, I'd say
>
> - priority: affects qdisc classification, may refer to classes of the
>   old namespace
> - ipvs_property: might cause packets to incorrectly skip netfilter hooks
> - nf_trace: might trigger packet tracing
> - nf_bridge: contains references to network devices in the old NS,
>   also indicates packet was bridged
> - iif: index is only valid in the originating namespace
> - tc_index: classification result, should only be set in the namespace
>   of the classifier
> - tc_verd: RTTL etc. should begin at zero again
> - probably secmark.

Wow.  I thought we were trying to reduce skbuff, where did all of those
fields come from?  Regarless that sounds like a good list to get stomped.

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/