Re: [PATCH 1/4 tip/sched/core] sched: rename preempt_notifier tosched_notifier and always enable it

[Ingo Molnar]

* Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Please send all sched.c modifications via the scheduler tree. Going 
> > via other trees is fine when there's agreement by the maintainers - 
> > but this is one of the rare cases where that's not the case.
> 
> Yeah, sure.  So, two patchsets.  One for sched/core doing pure 
> reorganization without any functional changes.  The other for 
> sched/notifier (or whatever name you would prefer) which is purely for 
> development and testing and will not be pushed to Linus unless it 
> receives notifier framework cleanup.  wq#for-next will pull from 
> sched/notifier and be exported to linux-next but it will never be 
> submitted to Linus until sched/notifier is cleaned up.  Am I 
> understanding it correctly?

Yeah, that would be fine.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/