Re: powerpc: fork && stepping (Was: [RFC,PATCH 0/14] utrace/ptrace)

From: Veaceslav Falico
Date: Fri Nov 27 2009 - 12:47:04 EST


On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 11:37:03PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Could you look at this
>
> ptrace-copy_process-should-disable-stepping.patch
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=125789789322573
>
> patch? It is not clear to me how we can modify the test-case to
> verify it fixes the original problem for powerpc.

I modified the test-case, it confirms that
ptrace-copy_process-should-disable-stepping.patch fixes the
problem with TIF_SINGLESTEP copied by fork() on powerpc.

Probably we need a similar fix for step-fork.c in ptrace-tests.

Modified the original testcase to call fork via syscall(__NR_fork),
to avoid the looping inside libc's fork() on powerpc.
The parent singlesteps until he sees that the child has forked, after
that the parent PTRACE_CONTs until the child exits.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>

int main(void)
{
void *addr_after_fork = &&after_fork;
int pid, status;

if (!(pid = fork())) {
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME) == 0);
kill(getpid(), SIGSTOP);

if (!syscall(__NR_fork)) {
/* kernel bug: this child will be killed by SIGTRAP */
printf("Hello world\n");
return 43;
}

after_fork: wait(&status);
return WEXITSTATUS(status);
}

for (;;) {
siginfo_t info;

assert(pid == wait(&status));
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO, pid, 0,&info) == 0);
if (info.si_addr == addr_after_fork)
break;
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, pid, 0,0) == 0);
}

for (;;) {
if (WIFEXITED(status))
break;
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0,0) == 0);
assert(pid == wait(&status));
}

assert(WEXITSTATUS(status) == 43);
return 0;
}

--
Veaceslav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/