Re: [PATCH] percpu: explain quick paths in pcpu_[de]populate_chunk()

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On 12/01/2009 02:40 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>> So, I don't know.  The first iteration only loop looks a bit unusual
>> for sure but it isn't something conceptually convoluted.
> 
> Now this seems to be better. So with this change, we can do:
> 
> pcpu_first_pop_region(chunk, rs, re, start, end);
> if (rs < re && ...)
>    return;
> 
> Right?

Yeap, but is that any better?  Passing lvalue loop parameters to loop
constructs is customary.  For almost all other cases, it's not, so

 pcpu_first_pop_region(chunk, &rs, &re, start, end)

would be better but then we have two similar looking interfaces which
take different types of parameters.  Also, you probably can drop rs <
re test there but for me it just seems easier to simply check the
first iteration.  If you think it's something worth changing and it
looks better afterwards, please send a patch.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/