[PATCH] percpu: refactor the code in pcpu_[de]populate_chunk()

[Cong Wang]

Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 12/01/2009 03:35 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > What do you think about the patch below? Untested.
>
> Oh, yeah, that's prettier.  Just one thing, can you please move rs
> initialization right above the pcpu_next_[un]pop() call?  The
> input/output parameters for those functions are already pretty
> confusing, let's make it at least a bit clearer.

Sure, done.

------------->

Using break statement at the end of a for loop is confusing,
refactor it by replacing the for loop.

Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>

---

diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 5adfc26..2941ed9 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -914,11 +914,10 @@ static void pcpu_depopulate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int off, int size)
 	int rs, re;
 
 	/* quick path, check whether it's empty already */
-	pcpu_for_each_unpop_region(chunk, rs, re, page_start, page_end) {
-		if (rs == page_start && re == page_end)
-			return;
-		break;
-	}
+	rs = page_start;
+	pcpu_next_unpop(chunk, &rs, &re, page_end);
+	if (rs == page_start && re == page_end)
+		return;
 
 	/* immutable chunks can't be depopulated */
 	WARN_ON(chunk->immutable);
@@ -969,11 +968,10 @@ static int pcpu_populate_chunk(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int off, int size)
 	int rs, re, rc;
 
 	/* quick path, check whether all pages are already there */
-	pcpu_for_each_pop_region(chunk, rs, re, page_start, page_end) {
-		if (rs == page_start && re == page_end)
-			goto clear;
-		break;
-	}
+	rs = page_start;
+	pcpu_next_pop(chunk, &rs, &re, page_end);
+	if (rs == page_start && re == page_end)
+		goto clear;
 
 	/* need to allocate and map pages, this chunk can't be immutable */
 	WARN_ON(chunk->immutable);