Re: [PATCH 4/4] copy_signal cleanup: clean tty_audit_fork()

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 12/01, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>
> Remove unneeded initialization in tty_audit_fork().
>
> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_audit.c b/drivers/char/tty_audit.c
> index ac16fbe..283a15b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tty_audit.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tty_audit.c
> @@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ void tty_audit_fork(struct signal_struct *sig)
>  	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
>  	sig->audit_tty = current->signal->audit_tty;
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
> -	sig->tty_audit_buf = NULL;
>  }

OK, but given that this function is "far" from copy_signal() path
and it is not inline, perhaps it makes sense to add the comment which
explains *sig must be zeroed, and the only caller is copy_signal().


Hmm. Off-topic, but why do we take ->siglock? ->audit_tty is boolean,
afaics ->siglock buys nothing.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/