Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3
From: Michal Simek
Date: Thu Dec 03 2009 - 02:40:33 EST
Hi,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
My usual call for calm: please do not put stuff destined for 2.6.34 into
linux-next trees until after 2.6.33-rc1.
Michael Neuling has written an interesting blog entry
(http://neuling.org/mikey/index.cgi/tech/linux-next-size.html) about some
stats he has gathered.
Changes since 20091202:
New tree: kbuild-current
The powerpc tree lost its build failure.
The ext3 tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
The net tree lost a conflict.
The mtd tree gained a conflict against the mips tree.
The tip tree lost a conflict.
The workqueues tree lost its conflicts.
todays tree is working on MMU microblaze correctly without any visible
problem but noMMU microblaze kernel still have that bug as I reported
some days ago.
Thanks,
Michal
Calibrating delay loop... 116.32 BogoMIPS (lpj=581632)
Mount-cache hash table entries: 512
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at include/linux/percpu.h:157 __create_workqueue_key+0x6c/0x194()
Modules linked in:
Stack:
9f823f1c 902642ec 00000000 00000000 901d1ac4 90011a1c 901cc458 901d1ac4
0000009d 90024308 000005b6 000005b7 9f801920 00000000 00000000 901d1adc
90024300 00000000 902755a4 902755a4 00000000 00000000 901d1adc 90263174
Call Trace:
[<902642ec>] spawn_softlockup_task+0x0/0xb0
[<90011a1c>] warn_slowpath_null+0xc/0x20
[<90024308>] __create_workqueue_key+0x6c/0x194
[<90024300>] __create_workqueue_key+0x64/0x194
[<90263174>] init_workqueues+0x48/0xa0
[<9025c104>] kernel_init+0x0/0x164
[<9025c140>] kernel_init+0x3c/0x164
[<9025c168>] kernel_init+0x64/0x164
[<900019d8>] kernel_thread_helper+0xc/0x20
[<900019cc>] kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x20
---[ end trace 139ce121c98e96c9 ]---
NET: Registered protocol family 16
bio: create slab <bio-0> at 0
Switching to clocksource microblaze_clocksource
NET: Registered protocol family 2
microblaze_timer_set_mode: oneshot
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have created today's linux-next tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
(patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/next/ ). If you
are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
old one. You should use "git fetch" as mentioned in the FAQ on the wiki
(see below).
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
file in the source. There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log files
in the Next directory. Between each merge, the tree was built with
a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc and an allmodconfig for x86_64. After the
final fixups (if any), it is also built with powerpc allnoconfig (32 and
64 bit), ppc44x_defconfig and allyesconfig (minus
CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES - this fails its final link) and i386, sparc
and sparc64 defconfig. These builds also have
CONFIG_ENABLE_WARN_DEPRECATED, CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK and
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO disabled when necessary.
Below is a summary of the state of the merge.
We are up to 154 trees (counting Linus' and 21 trees of patches pending
for Linus' tree), more are welcome (even if they are currently empty).
Thanks to those who have contributed, and to those who haven't, please do.
Status of my local build tests will be at
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If maintainers want to give
advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
more builds.
Thanks to Jan Dittmer for adding the linux-next tree to his build tests
at http://l4x.org/k/ , the guys at http://test.kernel.org/ and Randy
Dunlap for doing many randconfig builds.
There is a wiki covering stuff to do with linux-next at
http://linux.f-seidel.de/linux-next/pmwiki/ . Thanks to Frank Seidel.
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/