Re: OOM kernel behaviour - 2.6.32

[Jonathan Miles]

On 01/12/09 18:07 Jonathan Miles said the following:

> It's Ubuntu's (Karmic) 2.6.31 .deb and I don't know exactly what they've
> done to it, but AFAIK, no containers or policies. I'll compile 2.6.31.6
> and test with that. Won't be able to do this until Friday, so will check
> back in then.

Everything is fine having compiled straight 2.6.32. I watched the cache
being reclaimed with top as I used more and more RAM and didn't see the
OOM killer being invoked. So it was either a problem with 2.6.31 or with
whatever Ubuntu did to make the .deb.

Thanks,

-- 
Jonathan Miles <jon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jonmiles

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/