Re: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data_loc?

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Sun Dec 06 2009 - 23:03:12 EST


On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:34:43PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> VERY very sorry for my long silence...
>
> Please don't commit this patch, Ingo.
> This patch is required to test the next patch for perf lock.
>
> I have a question for Steven Rostedt and Tom Zanussi.
> Does current raw_field_ptr() support __data_loc?
>
> At 064739bc4b3d7f424b2f25547e6611bcf0132415 ,
> support for the modifier "__data_loc" of format is added.



I guess this patch handled the nature of the strings, but the current
end use is in perl. There is no support of it in raw_field_ptr().

Your patch looks good to me..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/