Re: [PATCH 03/13] tracing: Move a printk out of ftrace_raw_reg_event_foo()

[Li Zefan]

>> -static void ftrace_event_enable_disable(struct ftrace_event_call *call,
>> +static int ftrace_event_enable_disable(struct ftrace_event_call *call,
>>  					int enable)
>>  {
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>>  	switch (enable) {
>>  	case 0:
>>  		if (call->enabled) {
>> @@ -131,12 +133,19 @@ static void ftrace_event_enable_disable(struct ftrace_event_call *call,
>>  		break;
>>  	case 1:
>>  		if (!call->enabled) {
>> +			ret = call->regfunc(call);
>> +			if (ret) {
>> +				pr_info("event trace: Could not enable event "
>> +					"%s\n", call->name);
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>>  			call->enabled = 1;
>>  			tracing_start_cmdline_record();
>> -			call->regfunc(call);
> 
> That seems to open a tiny window during which we'll lose
> some pid -> comm resolution records.
> 
> We should probably keep the previous call order.
> 

Hm, actually the tiny window is already there in that
tracing_stop_cmdline_record() is called before call->unregfunc()..

So I can send a fix-up patch later.

> Other than that:
> 
> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> 

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/