Re: mmotm-2009-12-08-17-45 resume slowly

From: Dave Young
Date: Fri Dec 11 2009 - 04:14:19 EST


On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 14:29 -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:52:51 +0900 (JST)
>>
>> > (cc to netdev)
>> >
>> > Hi net-folks
>> >
>> >> > [ Â,A 561.323866] mtrr: type mismatch for e0000000,10000000 old:
>> >> > write-back new: write-combining
>> >> > [ 2688.500033] No probe response from AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b after
>> >> > 500ms, disconnecting.
>> >> > [ 2689.580376] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:02:2d:08:51:2b (try 1)
>> >
>> > What's mean "No probe response"? Why its point waste 2000sec?
>>
>> I think you'll get more responses from the wireless list,
>> replacing netdev with linux-wireless in the CC:...
>
> That is definitely done asynchronously, there's no reason it should
> delay the resume.

Yes, agree too. Please see my another reply. the darkness of screen
make me post more kernel messages then needed.

>
> johannes
>



--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/