Re: BFS v0.311 CPU scheduler for 2.6.32

[Con Kolivas]

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:10:39 Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Could you make the scheduler build time configurable instead of replacing
> the existing one? Embedded folks in particular may love a low footprint
> scheduler.
> 

It's not a bad idea, but the kernel still needs to be patched either way. To 
get BFS they'd need to patch the kernel. If they didn't want BFS, they 
wouldn't patch it in the first place.

Thanks,
-- 
-ck
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/