[PATCH 58/58] tty: split the lock up a bit further

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The tty count sanity check may need the BKL, that isn't clear. However it
is clear that the count use of the lock is internal and independant of the
bigger use of the lock.

Furthermore the file list locking is also separately locked already

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/char/tty_io.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_io.c b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
index a19fef2..684f0e0 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tty_io.c
@@ -516,6 +516,8 @@ static void do_tty_hangup(struct work_struct *work)
 	/* inuse_filps is protected by the single kernel lock */
 	lock_kernel();
 	check_tty_count(tty, "do_tty_hangup");
+	unlock_kernel();
+
 	file_list_lock();
 	/* This breaks for file handles being sent over AF_UNIX sockets ? */
 	list_for_each_entry(filp, &tty->tty_files, f_u.fu_list) {
@@ -529,6 +531,7 @@ static void do_tty_hangup(struct work_struct *work)
 	}
 	file_list_unlock();
 
+	lock_kernel();
 	tty_ldisc_hangup(tty);
 
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
-- 
1.6.5.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/