Re: Badness at net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:293

[Eric Dumazet]

Le 12/12/2009 10:22, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le 12/12/2009 10:03, David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:43:10 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>> today I upgraded from 2.6.32-rc7 to the latest -git (mainline) and after a 
>>> few hours the messages below appeared in the log. Apparently "privoxy" was 
>>> very busy handling connections, but the messages never appeared with 
>>> earlier kernels. 
>>>
>>> Full dmesg & .config is on:
>>> http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.33-git/inet_accept/
>>
>> Yeah I started seeing this on one of my machines too, the
>> assertion is:
>>
>> 	WARN_ON(newsk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV);
>>
>> I wonder if some of the refactorings we did to allow per-route
>> SACK/DSACK/etc. controls messed some sequence of state changes
>> on TCP sockets.  But I can't find anything obvious in those
>> commits.
> 
> Could it be about syncookies patches ?
> 
> tcp_create_openreq_child() changes ?
> 

It seems to me tcp_create_openreq_child() doesnt properly initialize
newtp->cookie_values to NULL, but this should not produce warnings like that ?

Sorry to not provides a proper patch now, I have to run...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/