Re: [PATCH] Fix tracing infrastructure to support multipleincludes when defining CREATE_TRACE_POINTS

[Neil Horman]

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:53:41PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 03:49:26PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 15:47 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Note this patch also converts the napi_poll tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT.  This
> > > > is done so that the TRACE_EVENT fix doesn't break the build, and because its
> > > > rather pointless I think given the current tracing infrastructure to not have
> > > > napi_poll be an independent event.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Thanks, I'll give it a test. But because this now touches networking
> > > code, I need an Acked-by from David Miller before I can pull it in.
> > > 
> > > -- Steve
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > linux/tracepoint.h   |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > > > trace/define_trace.h |    1 +
> > > > trace/events/napi.h  |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 
> > Hmm, This really isn't networking code. But still, a patch that changes
> > the way a networking trace point works, I would rather have an ack.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> Copy that, I agree an Ack from dave is called for here, but Just FYi, theres
> only one user of this tracepoint currently in the tree (the drop monitor) and
> this change has no bearing on it, as you can still hook the tracepoint with the
> same register_trace_napi_poll call
> 
> Neil
> 
Ping, Dave, any thoughts here?
Regards
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/