Re: [PATCH 4/8] Use prepare_to_wait_exclusive() insteadprepare_to_wait()

From: Minchan Kim
Date: Mon Dec 14 2009 - 18:09:14 EST


On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:30:19 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> if we don't use exclusive queue, wake_up() function wake _all_ waited
> task. This is simply cpu wasting.
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index e0cb834..3562a2d 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@ static int shrink_zone_begin(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
> * we would just make things slower.
> */
> for (;;) {
> - prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + prepare_to_wait_exclusive(wq, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> if (atomic_read(&zone->concurrent_reclaimers) <=
> max_zone_concurrent_reclaimers)
> @@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@ static int shrink_zone_begin(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc)
> */
> if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, sc->order, low_wmark_pages(zone),
> 0, 0)) {
> - wake_up(wq);
> + wake_up_all(wq);

I think it's typo. The description in changelog says we want "wake_up".
Otherwise, looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>

--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/