Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Remove usedac infeature-removal-schedule.txt

[FUJITA Tomonori]

On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:57:55 -0500
Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:58:01 GMT, tip-bot for FUJITA Tomonori said:
> > Commit-ID:  06f8bda8324fa8bf39eed81d8b3df08063a37696
> 
> > x86: Remove usedac in feature-removal-schedule.txt
> 
> > The usedac option enables us to stop via_no_dac() setting
> > forbid_dac to 1. That is, someone who uses VIA bridges can use
> > DAC with this option even if some of VIA bridges seem to be
> > broken about DAC.
> 
> Does there exist real hardware where this makes sense?  If the chipset
> detects as "broken-DAC", is it in fact safe to use?

Not safe. Probably, you would see data corruption.

arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c says:

/* Many VIA bridges seem to corrupt data for DAC. Disable it here */


Seems that some of VIA bridges were fine. So this option made sense
with some hardware. I'm not sure if there are still users of this
option now.


>  Or is it similar to
> the 'force-enable HPET' code for some older boxes, where the HPET was in
> fact there but simply not advertised, so going ahead and using it was
> in fact perfectly safe? Allowing the use of "working but not advertised"
> is probably a good thing, allowing the use of known-broken probably isn't.
> 
> If it's just unadvertised, I wonder if if there's a way to write a quirk
> for VIA systems that will detect the situation and enable the support?

I guess that we could however it doesn't worth adding tricks for old
hardware.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/