Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: unify iwl_setup_rxon_timing

From: Stefan Bader
Date: Tue Dec 15 2009 - 12:28:12 EST


Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:39:24AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 08:34:00AM -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>>
>>> I agree here. Not copying Reinette on this is just wrong. And blindly
>>> picking some patches and sending them for -stable even more.
>> I agree that Reinette should have been copied. I'm not sure I agree
>> that sending the patches was wrong by itself.
>
> I'm not saying it is wrong, but I agree, you need to copy the
> maintainer, as we would need their ack before being able to accept any
> type of backport.
>
> Ike, the script, scripts/get_maintainer.pl is your friend here.

I should take some of the bashing here for not having been too
specific when pushing people to "send it to stable". As John said,
we are learning here.

I see that this gets improved.

Thanks,
Stefan

> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/