Re: [mm][RFC][PATCH 0/11] mm accessor updates.

[Minchan Kim]

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Also the patches didn't fare too well in testing unfortunately.
>> >
>> > I suspect we'll rather need multiple locks split per address
>> > space range.
>>
>> This set doesn't include any changes of the logic. Just replace all mmap_sem.
>> I think this is good start point (for introducing another logic etc..)
>
> The problem is that for range locking simple wrapping the locks
> in macros is not enough. You need more changes.

I agree.

We can't justify to merge as only this patch series although this
doesn't change
any behavior.

After we see the further works, let us discuss this patch's value.

Nitpick:
In case of big patch series, it would be better to provide separate
all-at-once patch
with convenience for easy patch and testing. :)

Thanks for great effort. Kame.

>
> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
>



-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/