Re: [PATCH -next] x86 msrs: alloc/free for CONFIG_SMP=n

[Randy Dunlap]

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:58:08 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:51:19PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Rearrange arch/x86/lib/msr.c so that alloc/free are built and
> > usable when CONFIG_SMP=n.  Fixes build of amd64_edac.
> > 
> > ERROR: "msrs_free" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "msrs_alloc" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!
> >
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/lib/Makefile |    2 -
> >  arch/x86/lib/msr.c    |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> Haha, I just sent a very similar one :)

Yes, I noticed.

> > 
> > --- linux-next-20091216.orig/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> > +++ linux-next-20091216/arch/x86/lib/Makefile
> > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ $(obj)/inat.o: $(obj)/inat-tables.c
> >  
> >  clean-files := inat-tables.c
> >  
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) := msr.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_MSR) := msr.o
> 
> however, CONFIG_X86_MSR is the x86 MSR access module and the <lib/msr.c>
> is the library of MSR accessing functions which is always in. So this
> should be unconditional as in my version or Peter might have a better
> idea...?

Sure, whichever is OK with me.

---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/