Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > I'm personally curious as to what kind of scheduler issues this results 
> > in--I haven't done any BFS vs CFS tests with this option enabled yet.
> 
> I'll look for x264 source, and patch/piddle.

btw., would be nice to look at it via tools/perf/ as well:

  perf stat --repeat 3 ...

to see the basic hardware utilization (cycles/cache-misses, branch execution 
rate, instructions, etc.) and the basic parallelism metrics, at a glance.

i suspect "perf stat -e L1-icache-loads -e L1-icache-load-misses" would give 
us an even more detailed picture.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/