Re: [kernel] Re: kernel/rcutree.h:301: sorry, unimplemented:inlining failed in call to 'rcu_bootup_announce': function body notavailable

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Fri Dec 18 2009 - 12:28:00 EST

Next message: Jesse Barnes: "Re: intelligent CLS kills qemu's 8139cp"
Previous message: Luis R. Rodriguez: "git pull on linux-next makes my system crawl to its knees and beg for mercy"
In reply to: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: [kernel] Re: kernel/rcutree.h:301: sorry, unimplemented: inliningfailed in call to 'rcu_bootup_announce': function body not available"
Next in thread: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: [kernel] Re: kernel/rcutree.h:301: sorry, unimplemented: inliningfailed in call to 'rcu_bootup_announce': function body not available"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 08:07:51AM -0900, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> Hello Paul (& Americo, ALL) ,
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:52:51PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Mr. James W. Laferriere
>>> <babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hello All ,
>>>>
>>>> gcc -Wp,-MD,kernel/.rcutree.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
>>>> /usr/lib/gcc/i486-slackware-linux/3.4.6/include -Iinclude
>>>> -I/usr/src/linux-2.6.32.1/arch/x86/include -include
>>>> include/linux/autoconf.h
>>>> -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
>>>> -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -Werror-implicit-function-declaration
>>>> -Wno-format-security -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m32
>>>> -msoft-float
>>>> -mregparm=3 -freg-struct-return -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
>>>> -fno-unit-at-a-time -march=i686 -ffreestanding -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -pipe
>>>> -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx
>>>> -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
>>>> -g
>>>> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s"
>>>> -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(rcutree)"
>>>> -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(rcutree)" -c -o kernel/rcutree.o
>>>> kernel/rcutree.c
>>>> kernel/rcutree.c: In function `__rcu_init':
>>>> kernel/rcutree.h:301: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to
>>>> 'rcu_bootup_announce': function body not available
>>>> kernel/rcutree.c:1740: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
>>>> make[1]: *** [kernel/rcutree.o] Error 1
>>>> make: *** [kernel] Error 2
>>>>
>>>> There is no way , thru the 'make *config' methods to
>>>> disable this
>>>> broken stuff , So How may I get past this brokeness ?
>>>> And looking the posts for the 2.6.32-pre/rc the old rcu has
>>>> been
>>>> trashed completely . So I am not able to even try using that .
>>>>
>>>> Would someone please shed some light on this . I really
>>>> need the
>>>> updates for the Fusion/mpt driver & the changes in the /md/ tree as well
>>>> .
>>>
>>> Hmm, I see the problem, but not sure how to fix it...
>>>
>>> Paul, why do we have #include "rcutree_plugin.h" at the bottom
>>> of rcutree.c? This looks strange for me...
>>>
>>> How about moving it up? At least just move upper to rcu_init().
>>
>> Could you please apply commit #dbe01350fa8ce0c11948ab7d6be71a4d901be151
>> from Linus's git tree? Corresponding diff attached.
>>
>> Thanx, Paul
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
>> index c1891c3..ddb79ec 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcutree.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
>> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data);
>> #else /* #ifdef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */
>>
>> /* Forward declarations for rcutree_plugin.h */
>> -static inline void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
>> +static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
>> long rcu_batches_completed(void);
>> static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu);
>> static int rcu_preempted_readers(struct rcu_node *rnp);
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
>> index ef2a58c..c03edf7 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data);
>> /*
>> * Tell them what RCU they are running.
>> */
>> -static inline void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
>> +static void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
>> {
>> printk(KERN_INFO
>> "Experimental preemptable hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
>> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void exit_rcu(void)
>> /*
>> * Tell them what RCU they are running.
>> */
>> -static inline void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
>> +static void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
>> {
>> printk(KERN_INFO "Hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
>> }
>
> Thank you & Americo for responding .
>
> Patch applied & same error as far as I can tell .
> did
>
> make mrproper
> cp ../old.config .config (same as in previous email)
> make oldconfig
> ( time make V=1 KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 INSTALL_PATH=/boot clean all install
> modules_install ) >../linux-2.6.32.1d.log 2>&1
> error'd (See below) ...
>
> If there is any further info I can provide or something I can do to
> provide , Please request it .

Hmmm.... Yes. Could you please execute the following command from
the top-level directory of your patched kernel source tree?

grep rcu_bootup_announce kernel/rcu*

I would expect the following output:

kernel/rcutree.c: rcu_bootup_announce();
kernel/rcutree.h:static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:static void __init rcu_bootup_announce(void)
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h:static void __init rcu_bootup_announce(void)

Thanx, Paul

> Tia , JimL
>
> gcc -Wp,-MD,kernel/.rcutree.o.d -nostdinc -isystem
> /usr/lib/gcc/i486-slackware-linux/3.4.6/include -Iinclude
> -I/usr/src/linux-2.6.32.1/arch/x86/include -include
> include/linux/autoconf.h -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
> -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security
> -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m32 -msoft-float -mregparm=3
> -freg-struct-return -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fno-unit-at-a-time
> -march=i686 -ffreestanding -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -pipe -Wno-sign-compare
> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls -g
> -Wdeclaration-after-statement -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=#s"
> -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(rcutree)"
> -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(rcutree)" -c -o kernel/rcutree.o
> kernel/rcutree.c
> kernel/rcutree.c: In function `__rcu_init':
> kernel/rcutree.h:301: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to
> 'rcu_bootup_announce': function body not available
> kernel/rcutree.c:1740: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> make[1]: *** [kernel/rcutree.o] Error 1
> make: *** [kernel] Error 2
>
>
> --
> +------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS |
> | Network&System Engineer | 3237 Holden Road | Give me Linux |
> | babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Fairbanks, AK. 99709 | only on AXP |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------+

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jesse Barnes: "Re: intelligent CLS kills qemu's 8139cp"
Previous message: Luis R. Rodriguez: "git pull on linux-next makes my system crawl to its knees and beg for mercy"
In reply to: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: [kernel] Re: kernel/rcutree.h:301: sorry, unimplemented: inliningfailed in call to 'rcu_bootup_announce': function body not available"
Next in thread: Mr. James W. Laferriere: "Re: [kernel] Re: kernel/rcutree.h:301: sorry, unimplemented: inliningfailed in call to 'rcu_bootup_announce': function body not available"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]