RE: [PATCH 1/5] arch/arm: Correct NULL test

[Julia Lawall]

On Mon, 28 Dec 2009, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:

> On Sunday, December 27, 2009 3:08 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>>  	dbgfs_chan = kmalloc(sizeof(*dbgfs_state) * num_dma_channels,
> >>>  			     GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> -	if (!dbgfs_state)
> >>> +	if (!dbgfs_chan)
> >>>  		goto err_alloc;
> >> Shouldn't the malloc line read:
> >> 
> >> 	... = kmalloc(sizeof(*dbgfs_chan) * ...)
> >> 	                      ^^^^^^^^^^
> >> 
> >> ?
> >
> > Good point, thanks.  I will send a revised patch.
> 
> Wouldn't this be clearer?
> 
> 	... = kmalloc(sizeof(struct dentry) * ...)

Documentation/CodingStyle thinks otherwise:

"The preferred form for passing a size of a struct is the following:

	p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ...);

The alternative form where struct name is spelled out hurts readability 
and introduces an opportunity for a bug when the pointer variable type is 
changed but the corresponding sizeof that is passed to a memory allocator 
is not."

And actually, in this case, sizeof(struct dentry) would be wrong, because 
the type of dbgfs_chan is struct dentry **, not struct dentry *.  What is 
wanted is an array of pointers.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/