Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Prevent from BITS_PER_LONG redefinition

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:11:20PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 12/19/2009 06:34 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> Yeah but we need it from the CPP level.
>> We include such code located in kernel headers:
>>
>> static __always_inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word)
>> {
>> 	int num = BITS_PER_LONG - 1;
>>
>> #if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
>> 	if (!(word&  (~0ul<<  32))) {
>> 		num -= 32;
>> 		word<<= 32;
>> 	}
>> #endif
>> 	if (!(word&  (~0ul<<  (BITS_PER_LONG-16)))) {
>> 		num -= 16;
>> 		word<<= 16;
>> 	}
>>
>>
>> And sizeof() is not defined :)
>>    
>
> You can use if() with a constant expression instead of #if.



I did not write this code. But yes you're right, although I
think CPP is more suitable here because fls() can be called
from fastpath and this conditional build makes one check less
and lesser i-cache footprint.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/