Re: [PATCH] libsrp: fix compile failure

[James Bottomley]

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 16:21 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > > The fix is simple, just add the include, but how did this happen?  This 
> > > change, introduced at -rc2, hardly looks like a bug fix, and it clearly 
> > > didn't go through linux-next, which would have picked up this compile 
> > > failure (it only occurs on ppc because of the ibm virtual scsi target).
> > 
> > It came through Andrew - and apparently parts of Andrews chain weren't in 
> > next. Don't know why.
> 
> Uhm ... are they supposed to be? -mm is being built on top of -next, not 
> vice versa, right?

Well, the fact that the compile failure wasn't detected before it went
upstream should answer that ...

But to be more specific: linux-next is our integration tree (and also
the obscure architecture compile tree).  To ensure the best possible
integration, every tree should be built and tested in linux-next at
least once before it goes to Linus.  There were originally technical
reasons why -mm wasn't in ... I just thought they'd been fixed by now.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/