Re: [PATCH] libsrp: fix compile failure

From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Mon Jan 04 2010 - 17:00:48 EST


On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > Yes, it indeed is that way -- Andew pulls whole linux-next as one of the
> > patches into -mm series.
> >
> > To make linux-next really working the way it is intended to work we need
> > to have -mm part of it, as it is used as a last point for a non-trivial
> > amount of patches before they enter Linus' tree.
> >
> > Andrew, why do we have the current setup, and not the other way around?
>
> Because I suck. I haven't yet got around to feeding -mm into
> linux-next. It's a bit tricky, because -mm is based on linux-next.
> Probably we'll address this by adding a "linux-next before the mm bits"
> marker to linux-next.

Yup. That should work and would be really helpful.

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/