[no subject]

[Roel Kluin]

The fallback code in cipher mode touch the union fallback.blk instead
of fallback.cip. This is wrong because we use the cipher and not the
blockcipher. This did not show any side effects yet because both types /
structs contain the same element right now.

[bigeasy@breakpoint: different commit message, split the patch in two and
                     rebase ]

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
index 6be4503..58f4673 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
@@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ static int setkey_fallback_cip(struct crypto_tfm *tfm, const u8 *in_key,
 	struct s390_aes_ctx *sctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(tfm);
 	int ret;
 
-	sctx->fallback.blk->base.crt_flags &= ~CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MASK;
-	sctx->fallback.blk->base.crt_flags |= (tfm->crt_flags &
+	sctx->fallback.cip->base.crt_flags &= ~CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MASK;
+	sctx->fallback.cip->base.crt_flags |= (tfm->crt_flags &
 			CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MASK);
 
 	ret = crypto_cipher_setkey(sctx->fallback.cip, in_key, key_len);
 	if (ret) {
 		tfm->crt_flags &= ~CRYPTO_TFM_RES_MASK;
-		tfm->crt_flags |= (sctx->fallback.blk->base.crt_flags &
+		tfm->crt_flags |= (sctx->fallback.cip->base.crt_flags &
 				CRYPTO_TFM_RES_MASK);
 	}
 	return ret;
-- 
1.6.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/