Re: [PATCH v6] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag
From: Gleb Natapov
Date: Tue Jan 19 2010 - 05:41:32 EST
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:44:23AM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> me that you're trying to use a big hammer (mlock) when a polite hint
> >> for the VM would probably be sufficient for it do its job.
> > I what to tell to VM "swap this, don't swap that" and as far as I see
> > there is no other way to do it currently.
> Yeah, which is why I was suggesting that maybe posix_madvise() needs
> to be extended to have a MADV_NEED_BUT_LESS_IMPORTANT flag that can be
> used as a hint by mm/vmscan.c to first swap the guest address spaces.
If such thing would exist may be I would have used it since swapping out
of a wrong page is not live or death matter in my case, but mlockall()
provides me with exactly what I need and without swapping out wrong
pages. Speaking about adding such madvise call wouldn't it be even
harder to justify? It obviously not good enough for real-time use and my
case, I admit, is unusual. Also if we start prioritise memory why stop
on binary, why not set value like "this memory is more important then
that memory by factor of 5"?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/