Re: [PATCH 25/64] ide: use standard timing for XFER_PIO_SLOW modein ide_timing_compute()

[David Miller]

From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:42:57 +0300

>   But shouldn't this just be merged to "ide: use standard timing for
>   XFER_PIO_SLOW mode in ide_timing_compute()" since it's the patch that
>   introduced that check?

It's fine either way.

I can break the ide-next-2.6 tree for everyone by rebasing it to
unwind the 50 or so patches I applied from Bart yesterday to do this,
but really is that pain worth it since right thing is there in the
end?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/