RE: [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant

[Weber, Mathias]

On 01/20/2010 09:58 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>The current PI implementation violates POSIX scheduling semantics when
>a thread is deboosted. The following patch series adresses this.

I did rerun the test case with this patches applied and I can confirm
that this fixes the incorrect scheduling behavior in our test case.

Thanks, Thomas and Carsten for your help.

Tested-by: Mathias Weber <mathias.weber.mw1@xxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/