Re: Generic DMA - BUG_ON
From: Russell King
Date: Thu Jan 21 2010 - 12:54:11 EST
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:51:37AM -0600, Steven J. Magnani wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 12:00 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:53:50AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > and ops is NULL, then this code will oops; you will get a full register
> > > dump and backtrace. You can use this information along with markup_oops.pl
> > > to find out where the problem is.
> > You can't rely on the oops if the code runs in process context. The
> > process may have address 0 mapped which would result in a security hole.
> > We had two of these bugs last year.
> You also can't rely on an oops in a NOMMU environment.
I don't see why implementations where NULL pointer derefs should be
penalized by having additional NULL checks.
Maybe this needs to be a conditional check which can be optimized away
on architectures where NULL dereference always produces an oops.
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/