Re: [PATCH 01/01] regulator: support max8649

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:26:08AM -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:

This all looks good except...

> +static int max8649_enable_time(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{

...

> +	return (voltage / step);

I'd expect the time taken to enable to be the voltage multipled by the
step size rather than divided by the step size?

> +static int max8649_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned int mode)
> +{
> +	struct max8649_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
> +
> +	switch (mode) {
> +	case REGULATOR_MODE_FAST:
> +		max8649_set_bits(info->i2c, info->vol_reg, MAX8649_FORCE_PWM,
> +				 MAX8649_FORCE_PWM);
> +		break;
> +	case REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL:
> +		max8649_set_bits(info->i2c, info->vol_reg,
> +				 MAX8649_FORCE_PWM, 0);
> +		break;

This should really have a default case which rejects other modes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/