Re: 2.6.32.5 regression: page allocation failure. order:1,

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday 28 January 2010, Mark Lord wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
> > Mark Lord wrote:
> >> Mel Gorman wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:13:27PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> >>>> I recently upgraded our 24/7 server from 2.6.31.5 to 2.6.32.5.
> >>>>
> >>>> Now, suddenly the logs are full of "page allocation failure. order:1",
> >>>> and the odd "page allocation failure. order:4" failures.
> >>>>
> >>>> Wow.  WTF happened in 2.6.32 ???
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> There was one bug related to MIGRATE_RESERVE that might be affecting
> >>> you. It reported as impacting swap-orientated workloads but it could
> >>> easily affect drivers that depend on high-order atomic allocations.
> >>> Unfortunately, the fix is not signed-off yet but I expect it to make its
> >>> way towards mainline when it is.
> >>>
> >>> Here is the patch with a slightly-altered changelog. Can you test if it
> >>> makes a difference please?
> >> ..
> >>
> >> We don't like to reboot our 24/7 server very often,
> >> and certainly not for debugging buggy kernels.
> >>
> >> It's rock solid again with 2.6.31.12 on it now.
> >>
> >> The defining characteristic of that machine, is that it has only 512MB
> >> of physical RAM.  So perhaps I'll try booting a different machine here
> >> with mem=512M and see how that behaves.  If the problem shows up on that,
> >> then I'll try the patch.
> > ..
> > 
> > Sod it.  2.6.32 is simply too broken for us here on 32-bit non-SMP.
> > 
> > Attempting to boot a 32-bit kernel with "nosmp mem=512M" on my notebook
> > locks up at boot time with several repeated messages like this:
> > 
> >   request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt_464c
> > 
> > Useless kernel on 32-bit.  I hope 2.6.33 ends up less buggy.
> ..
> 
> I rebuilt it (again!), this time as a pure UP (non-SMP) kernel,
> and it still locks at boot, with or without the mem=512M parameter.
> 
> This is one really bad kernel release for 32-bit x86.

Have you attached a (2.6.31.x) dmesg output from the failing box somewhere
or have I just missed it?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/