Re: [PATCH] nfs: clear_commit_release incorrectly handle truncatedpage

[Trond Myklebust]

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:19 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: 
> On Feb 2, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 20:09 +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> >> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 19:47 +0300, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> >>>> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>>>> Hmm.... There is a known problem with a reference leak in
> >>>>> nfs_wb_page_cancel() (I've queued up a fix for 2.6.33 in the  
> >>>>> 'bugfixes'
> >>>>> branch of my git tree already). What happens when you apply the
> >>>>> following patch?
> >>>> The not helps, still get the same oops(log follows).
> >>>> Have you tried my testcase?
> >>>>
> >>>> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000040
> >>>> IP: [<f80d415f>] nfs_clear_request_commit+0x3f/0xb0 [nfs]
> >>>> *pde = 00000000
> >>>> Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> >>>> last sysfs file: /sys/devices/platform/thinkpad_acpi/leds/ 
> >>>> tpacpi::thinkvantage/uevent
> >>>> Modules linked in: binfmt_misc quota_v2 quota_tree nfsd exportfs  
> >>>> nfs lockd sunrpc iwl3945 thinkpad_acpi psmouse led_class  
> >>>> serio_raw iwlcore nvram raid1 raid0 linear e1000e
> >>>>
> >>>> Pid: 1035, comm: nfsiod Not tainted 2.6.33-rc6 #60 2623DDU/2623DDU
> >>>> EIP: 0060:[<f80d415f>] EFLAGS: 00010296 CPU: 0
> >>>> EIP is at nfs_clear_request_commit+0x3f/0xb0 [nfs]
> >>>> EAX: 00000000 EBX: c2561d80 ECX: c06d3700 EDX: 00000014
> >>>> ESI: f69916c0 EDI: f80dab58 EBP: f6724ef4 ESP: f6724ee8
> >>>>  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068
> >>>> Process nfsiod (pid: 1035, ti=f6724000 task=f69dda90  
> >>>> task.ti=f6724000)
> >>>> Stack:
> >>>>  c04df67d f69d7440 f69916c0 f6724f34 f80d4258 f6724f44 00001b0e  
> >>>> 00000000
> >>>> <0> ffff799c 00000400 f505f000 94c0042a f69917e0 f69917e8  
> >>>> 00000000 f69916c0
> >>>> <0> f69916c4 f69916c0 f80dab58 f6724f3c f8075703 f6724f58  
> >>>> f8075871 f6724f60
> >>>> Call Trace:
> >>>>  [<c04df67d>] ? schedule+0x3ad/0xa30
> >>>>  [<f80d4258>] ? nfs_commit_release+0x88/0x1a0 [nfs]
> >>>>  [<f8075703>] ? rpc_release_calldata+0x13/0x20 [sunrpc]
> >>>>  [<f8075871>] ? rpc_free_task+0x41/0x70 [sunrpc]
> >>>>  [<c01acc4c>] ? probe_workqueue_execution+0x8c/0xd0
> >>>>  [<f8075940>] ? rpc_async_release+0x10/0x20 [sunrpc]
> >>>>  [<c015834d>] ? worker_thread+0x10d/0x210
> >>>>  [<f8075930>] ? rpc_async_release+0x0/0x20 [sunrpc]
> >>>>  [<c015bb10>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
> >>>>  [<c0158240>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x210
> >>>>  [<c015b724>] ? kthread+0x74/0x80
> >>>>  [<c015b6b0>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
> >>>>  [<c0103546>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
> >>>> Code: f0 0f ba 70 28 01 19 d2 31 c0 85 d2 75 0e 8b 5d f8 8b 75 fc  
> >>>> 89 ec 5d c3 8d 74 26 00 89 d8 ba 10 00 00 00 e8 74 0e 10 c8 8b 43  
> >>>> 10 <8b> 70 40 9c 5b fa e8 26 67 0d c8 8d 46 30 b9 ff ff ff ff 0f bd
> >>>> EIP: [<f80d415f>] nfs_clear_request_commit+0x3f/0xb0 [nfs] SS:ESP  
> >>>> 0068:f6724ee8
> >>>> CR2: 0000000000000040
> >>>> ---[ end trace 4bf8ee9d233ce744 ]---
> >>>
> >>> Yep. Looking more carefully at your test case, I don't see how
> >>> truncate_inode_page() can be involved at all. You are extending  
> >>> the file
> >>> using lseek(), not truncate(). So something else must be at work  
> >>> here.
> >> open(,O_TRUNC,)
> >> do_filp_open()
> >>  handle_truncate()
> >>   do_truncate()
> >> Yess this is craziness to run concurrent tasks which do:
> >> open(,O_TRUNC,); mmap();
> >> But initially i've done this by occasion and this result in OOps :)
> >>>
> >>> I'll see if I can reproduce it.
> >>>
> >
> > OK. I haven't been able to reproduce your bug yet, but I think I see
> > what is happening.
> >
> > Your 'kill -9' will occasionally hit nfs_wb_page_cancel() and cause it
> > to fail. When _that_ happens, then all hell breaks loose, because
> > mapping->a_ops->invalidatepage() is not allowed to fail.
> >
> > Ugh... I don't think there much of an alternative to making
> > nfs_wait_on_request() uninterruptible. On the plus side, that does  
> > make
> > the behaviour of the NFS writeback code consistent with that of the  
> > VFS
> > layer (i.e. wait_on_page_writeback()).
> >
> > So here goes...
> >
> > Trond
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > NFS: Fix an Oops when truncating a file
> >
> > From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The VM/VFS does not allow mapping->a_ops->invalidatepage() to fail.
> > Unfortunately, nfs_wb_page_cancel() may fail if a fatal signal occurs.
> > Since the NFS code assumes that the page stays mapped for as long as  
> > the
> > writeback is active, we can end up Oopsing (among other things).
> >
> > The only safe fix here is to convert nfs_wait_on_request(), so as to  
> > make
> > it uninterruptible (as is already the case with  
> > wait_on_page_writeback()).
> 
> What happens when the server is unreachable while we're in  
> nfs_wait_on_request?

The same thing that happens if it is unreachable while we're in
wait_on_page_writeback. i.e. we hang until someone kills the RPC call
for us.

Trond

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/