Re: [PATCH] drivers/acpi/ec.c fix a small memory leak

[Darren Jenkins]

Hello Alexey,

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<astarikovskiy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> NAK
>
> saved_ec is allocated if flag EC_FLAGS_VALIDATE_ECDT is true.
> EC_FLAGS_SKIP_DSDT_SCAN have no sense in such case, thus this new code path
> is never executed.

>From what I can tell this is not guaranteed by the code, it is relying
on DMI data not matching two of the stings at once.
However I don't know anything about DMI, so if you say this makes no
sense and will never happen I am happy.

I will mark this as ignore in the Coverity databse.

> On the other hand, unconditionally freeing pointer, which is might be NULL, is not
> right either.

Nowadays this is the preferred method actually.

> Regards,
> Alex.

Thanks for the feedback.

Darren J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/