Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 04:38:22PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
> include/linux/ftrace_event.h, include/trace/ftrace.h,
> kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c, kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c and
> kernel/trace/trace_event_profile.c between commit
> 430ad5a600a83956749307b13257c464c3826b55 ("perf: Factorize trace events
> raw sample buffer operations") from the tip tree and commit
> eeb721be6bc03fe37755e69ab5c3ba2fe9897fd9 ("percpu: add __percpu sparse
> annotations to trace") from the percpu tree.
> 
> I attempted to fix them up (see below) but someone should check the
> result carefully.  (The apparently unchanged files below used the tip
> tree versions.)
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



I'm not very used to review patches on patches :)

But yeah that looks good to me.

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/