Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Feb 09 2010 - 03:55:14 EST


On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 15:23 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:45:04PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> > The main problem in implementing P4 PMU is that it has much more
> > restrictions for event to MSR mapping. So to fit into current
> > perf_events model I made the following:
>
> Is there somewhere accessible on the web where I can read about the P4
> PMU? I'm interested to see if the constraint representation and
> search I used on the POWER processors would be applicable.

Mostly:

http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/manual/253669.pdf

Section 30.8 PERFORMANCE MONITORING (PROCESSORS
BASED ON INTEL NETBURST MICROARCHITECTURE)

Section 30.9 PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND INTEL HYPER-
THREADING TECHNOLOGY IN PROCESSORS BASED
ON INTEL NETBURST MICROARCHITECTURE

Section A.8 PENTIUM 4 AND INTEL XEON PROCESSOR PERFORMANCE-MONITORING
EVENTS


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/