Re: [PATCH] drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c

[Thomas Renninger]

On Thursday 11 February 2010 11:52:20 Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> 
> > Eh, 
> > 
> > what is this for?:
> > static inline void *acpi_driver_data(struct acpi_device *d)
> > {
> >         return d->driver_data;
> > }
...
> 
> A potential patch that gets rid of the uses is below.  I don't have time 
> to look at this in more detail at the moment, but perhaps someone else 
> would like to do so.  The semantic patch (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr) 
> involved is:
> 
> @@
> struct acpi_device *d;
> @@
> 
> - acpi_driver_data(d)
> + d->driver_data
Len, do you mind adding this to your test branch, please.
I can grep over it afterwards (somewhen...) and void out
acpi_driver_data(..)
declaration in acpi_bus.h.

I expect also Darren has to rebase his fixes on top of this
one then.

Thanks,

     Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/