Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: add NOFOLLOW flag to umount(2)

[Miklos Szeredi]

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:15:53PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >  - renamed flag to UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW
> >  - added UMOUNT_UNUSED for feature detection
> 
> Umm, why?  MNT_ certainly isn't the best naming for unmount flags,
> but switching convention after we had a few doesn't make any sense.

It's not just bad naming, having another set of unrelated flags with
the same prefix *and* in close proximity to each other is asking for
trouble.

We could rename all the umount flags, and leave userspace do #defines
for backward compat.  It's not as if this was some widely used or
portable API.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/