Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: hv: Add proper versioning to HV drivers

From: Greg KH
Date: Thu Feb 11 2010 - 16:39:25 EST


On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:32:29PM +0000, Hank Janssen wrote:
>
> Provide proper versioning information for all HV drivers.
>
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> drivers/staging/hv/VersionInfo.h | 11 ++++++++---
> drivers/staging/hv/Vmbus.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/staging/hv/blkvsc_drv.c | 2 ++
> drivers/staging/hv/netvsc_drv.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c | 2 ++
> drivers/staging/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/VersionInfo.h b/drivers/staging/hv/VersionInfo.h
> index 9c3641d..e729b9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/hv/VersionInfo.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/VersionInfo.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,13 @@
> #ifndef __HV_VERSION_INFO
> #define __HV_VERSION_INFO
>
> -static const char VersionDate[] = __DATE__;
> -static const char VersionTime[] = __TIME__;
> -static const char VersionDesc[] = "Version 2.0";
> +static const char hv_build_date[] = __DATE__;
> +static const char hv_build_time[] = __TIME__;

This should not be needed at all, as it make absolutely no sense.

> +/*
> + * We use the same version numbering for all Hyper-V modules.
> + */
> +#define HV_DRV_VERSION "3.0.0"

Is this really needed? Now that the code is in the kernel tree,
shouldn't you be tracking this based on kernel release version (like 90%
of the drivers are tracked), or is there some requirement for a version
number?

And what decides when this number is changed? What does it "mean"?
What is it tracking?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/