Re: [PATCH] [1/4] SLAB: Handle node-not-up case infallback_alloc() v2

[Nick Piggin]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:07:12AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This is a better way to go anyway because it really is a proper
> > "fallback" alloc. I think that possibly used to work (ie. kmem_getpages
> > would be able to pass -1 for the node there) but got broken along the
> > line.
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> I should add there's still one open problem: in some cases 
> the oom killer kicks in on hotadd. Still working on that one.
> 
> In general hotadd was mighty bitrotted :/

Yes, that doesn't surprise me. I'm sure you can handle it, but send
some traces if you have problems.

 
> > Although it's not such a hot path to begin with, care to put a branch
> > annotation there?
> 
> pointer == NULL is already default unlikely in gcc
> 
> /* Pointers are usually not NULL.  */
> DEF_PREDICTOR (PRED_POINTER, "pointer", HITRATE (85), 0)
> DEF_PREDICTOR (PRED_TREE_POINTER, "pointer (on trees)", HITRATE (85), 0)

Well I still prefer to annotate it. I think builtin expect is 99%.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/