Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/3] sysctl: refactor integer handling proc code

From: Octavian Purdila
Date: Tue Feb 16 2010 - 05:52:35 EST


On Tuesday 16 February 2010 10:41:07 you wrote:

> > +
> > + if (!write && !first && left && !err)
> > + err = proc_put_newline(&buffer, &left);
> > + if (write && !err)
> > + err = proc_skip_wspace(&buffer, &left);
> > + if (err == -EFAULT /* do we really need to check for -EFAULT? */ ||
> > + (write && first))
> > + return err ? : -EINVAL;
>
> The logic here seems messy, adding one or two goto's may help?
>

OK, I'll give it a try.

What about the EFAULT check, is that really required?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/