Re: Testing for dirty buffers on a block device

[Jens Axboe]

On Wed, Feb 24 2010, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> > > That's not what I meant.  Dirty buffers on a filesystem make no 
> > > difference because they always get written out when the filesystem is 
> > > unmounted.  The device file remains open as long as the filesystem 
> > > is mounted, which would prevent the device from being powered down.
> > > 
> > > I was asking about dirty buffers on a block device that isn't holding a 
> > > filesystem -- where the raw device is being used directly for I/O.
> > 
> > OK, so just specifically the page cache of the device. Is that really
> > enough of an issue to warrant special checking? I mean, what normal
> > setup would even use buffer raw device access?
> 
> Doesn't fdisk use it?  There might be other applications too.

It does, but that sound be a very short lived issue (since the dirty
buffers will get flushed).

> > But if you wanted, I guess the only way would be to lookup
> > dirty/writeback pages on the bdev inode mapping. For that you'd need the
> > bdev, not the gendisk or the queue though.
> 
> I can get the bdev from the gendisk by calling bdget_disk() with a 
> partition number of 0, right?  What would the next step be?  Would this 
> check for dirty pages associated with any of the partitions or would it 
> only look at pages associated with the inode for the entire disk?

It would cover the entire bdev.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/