Re: [PATCH 03/07] kernel.h string cleanup

From: Dave Young
Date: Fri Feb 26 2010 - 05:51:18 EST


On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It will be more clean to put externs/declarations to their own header files.
>> At the same time compiling time benifits as well.
>>
>> printk/panic/string/trace header are splited then included by kernel.h so
>> just hexdump/int_sqrt are actually seperated.
>>
>> fresh boot
>
> You mean cold-cache compile so results are basically random?

Yes, roughly test.
I have to say I will have no time to do more testing.

>
>> and same .config, make without -j, test result as following:
>>
>> with the patches applied:
>>
>> time:
>> real 15m16.504s
>> user 12m51.866s
>> sys 1m39.700s
>>
>> vmlinux .text size: 003bfcd2
>>
>> without the patches applied*
>> time:
>> real 15m20.518s
>> user 12m54.120s
>> sys 1m40.190s
>
> Not scientific at all.
>



--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/