Re: Dynticks on Vortex86SX ? (Cx486SLC + just the standard i8254 PC timer)

[Mikael Pettersson]

Frantisek Rysanek writes:
 > Dear Gentlemen,
 > 
 > I'm having fun with a Vortex-based motherboard, under 2.6.33.
 > Linux reports the CPU as a Cx486SLC :-)
 > A complete PC-compatible motherboard (without VGA) running at ~ 2 
 > Watts.
 > I'm wondering how to decrease the power consumption even further,
 > and "tickless" operation comes to mind.
 > And that's where I have a problem. Even if I enable 
 > "Tickless System (Dynamic Ticks)" in the menuconfig,
 > there's no apparent change in consumption, and I still get 
 > around 200-300 timer interrupts per second...
 > 
 > These are some entries from my .config that might be relevant:
 > 
 > CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
 > CONFIG_NO_HZ=y
 > # CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is not set
 > CONFIG_M486=y
 > CONFIG_HZ_250=y
 > CONFIG_HZ=250

Select HZ=100.

 > The only timer that this platform contains (known to Linux)
 > is the generic i8254-compatible PC timer.
 > 
 > Makes me wonder if this platform is capable of "tickless" operation
 > at all. Or maybe my particular combination of features in the .config
 > effectively prevents the long idle periods from occurring?
 > 
 > Apart from a standard init and getty's, there's a dhclient and sshd 
 > running on the machine... it's a fairly minimal text-mode system.
 > 
 > Any ideas are welcome :-)

Enable CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL and CONFIG_TIMER_STATS, rebuild and reboot.
cat /proc/interrupts, echo 1 > /proc/timer_stats, sleep for 10 seconds,
cat /proc/timer_stats and /proc/interrupts.
That'll tell you which timers are firing the most, which translates into
requiring frequent timer interrupts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/